Kudos to Mike Homgren on 1 aspect - HE GETS IT!

Search

I am sorry for using the "R" word - and NOTHING EL
Joined
Oct 21, 1999
Messages
9,024
Tokens
ok, never mind the fact the seabags lost a game they shoulda won.

down 18-17 w/2 minutes left and no timeouts, he knows if arizona runs a play, is stopped, then kicks a FG by the time seattle gets the ball back they will still need a TD to win. (i didn't see the game but i assume) he lets emmitt run in for a TD (just like he did with Terrell Davis in the SB) so he can get the ball back with almost 2 minutes left on the clock and a better chance of scoring.
things don't work out as Hasslebeck throws an INT - but at least holmgren gave his team a chance to win - something most coaches don't do at the end of the game (see andy reid).

i say see andy reid - for at the end of regulation with the browns at the doorstep of the end zone to tie the game Reid NEVER calls a timeout to save time for his offense to get a FG, and lets the clock run and run and run and run and...and by the time the eagles get the ball they have LESS than 30 seconds left. but they still have those 3 worthless timeouts - NONE of which they ended up using. Reid let a good 45 seconds go. would you rather have 3 timeouts and 30 seconds left to try and get into FG range or 1 minute and NO timeouts to do so? for me - offense controls the clock - so i want my team with the ball with more time and less (or ZERO) timeouts. STUPID clock management by Andy Reid and he is lucky it didn't cost him!
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
I saw that in a high school game once (for the state championship). One team was down my 1 point and let the other team run it in for a TD with the resulting extra point instead of letting them run down the clock. The team that was down by 8 then marches back down the field and scores the 2-pointer to put the game into OT.

btw- the team that was down by 8 eventually lost the game. Good coaching though.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
988
Tokens
Everyone thought Emmit did something to break the record :biglaugh: . It amazes me how clueless almost all coaches and about the entire football public is when it comes to this strategy.


What are the odds an NFL kicker is going to miss a 29 yard field goal or score a TD and leave NO time on the clock for you. If there were more coaches in the world that had a half a brain cell, in that situation they would allow the other team to score so that they had a realistic chance (and some time on the clock) to allow their own offense a chance to tie the game up.

Good move, just turned out Hasselback sucked today.

Tought luck. :mad:
 

"American Idol Capping Expert"
Joined
Jul 20, 2001
Messages
7,591
Tokens
I Disagree. It Was 3rd And 9 At The Two Minute Warning. If They Stop Emmitt, Arizona Kicks A Field Goal And Seattle Gets The Ball Back With Approx. 1:10-1:20. That Is Plenty Of Time To Get It Done After A Kickoff Return. Plus You Would Only Be Down 4 Instead Of 8 Causing You To Need To Convert A Two Point Conversion.

They Did Not Let Emmitt Run In. He Is Simply The Best Ever.
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,438
Tokens
winkyduck said:
ok, never mind the fact the seabags lost a game they shoulda won.

down 18-17 w/2 minutes left and no timeouts, he knows if arizona runs a play, is stopped, then kicks a FG by the time seattle gets the ball back they will still need a TD to win. (i didn't see the game but i assume) he lets emmitt run in for a TD (just like he did with Terrell Davis in the SB) so he can get the ball back with almost 2 minutes left on the clock and a better chance of scoring.
things don't work out as Hasslebeck throws an INT - but at least holmgren gave his team a chance to win - something most coaches don't do at the end of the game (see andy reid).

i say see andy reid - for at the end of regulation with the browns at the doorstep of the end zone to tie the game Reid NEVER calls a timeout to save time for his offense to get a FG, and lets the clock run and run and run and run and...and by the time the eagles get the ball they have LESS than 30 seconds left. but they still have those 3 worthless timeouts - NONE of which they ended up using. Reid let a good 45 seconds go. would you rather have 3 timeouts and 30 seconds left to try and get into FG range or 1 minute and NO timeouts to do so? for me - offense controls the clock - so i want my team with the ball with more time and less (or ZERO) timeouts. STUPID clock management by Andy Reid and he is lucky it didn't cost him!

Holmgren never would have been in this position if he had "GOTTEN IT" and benched Hasselbeck in favor of Dilfer. Hasselbeck was given about 40 chances throughout this game to get in a rythm and prove to Holmgren he is a staring qb in the league. Dilfer is a very proven capable backup qb and Holmgren should have given his team a chance to win by putting Dilfer in after Hasselbeck threw his 3rd int.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
IDENTITY said:
I Disagree. It Was 3rd And 9 At The Two Minute Warning. If They Stop Emmitt, Arizona Kicks A Field Goal And Seattle Gets The Ball Back With Approx. 1:10-1:20. That Is Plenty Of Time To Get It Done After A Kickoff Return. Plus You Would Only Be Down 4 Instead Of 8 Causing You To Need To Convert A Two Point Conversion.

They Did Not Let Emmitt Run In. He Is Simply The Best Ever.
Emmitt should of retired about 3-4 years ago. Took him that long to break Paytons record.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,754
Messages
13,559,245
Members
100,682
Latest member
Pirrana1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com